A hot topic amongst St. Louis bloggers has been the presence and practices of David Mastio’s BlogNetNews.
Sigh.
The less gentle, more irritable part of me wants to tell ya’ll to chill the heck out. (Editorial note: since I moved to Virginia I am absolutely permitted to use ya’ll in a blog post, even though I remain morally opposed to it in official correspondence or conversation.) The reasonable, professional part of me also wants to dive into the fray state my opinion of aggregators with advertising, such as BlogNetNews.
I’ve remained quiet on this topic for quite some time, while bloggers I know and respect have posted at length on the topic. I’ve read it all and link below to what is, to my knowledge, the entire catalog of BNN-related St. Louis blog posts. So here it is: I respectfully disagree with the majority of you. In fact, when BNN launched its Missouri product, I contacted them and ASKED TO BE INCLUDED. Here’s why: where I live, there is a great blog aggregator, www.cvilleblogs.com. In the two years and three months I’ve used the aggregator and had my blog projects included in it, it has proved itself a tremendous resource for the blogging community, and for me, personally. C’ville blogs is not monetized. Honestly, I had to go look to be sure. I would not care if it were. In fact, I’d be pleased if my friend who runs the site made some income off this service he’s providing to the blogger (and blog reading) community.
In fact, when working with blogging clients, I recommend they seek aggregators within their industry, topic or geography as a way to get their content found and read.
So when BNN came on the scene in St. Louis I was, frankly, thrilled at the opportunity for added exposure for both my personal blog and Where Do You Stand? I e-mailed my colleagues joyfully to let them know about the aggregator and that we’d be part of it.
Here’s why the ads don’t bother me one bit — I read the hundreds of feeds that I monitor using Bloglines. With an aggregator service, I plug that feed into my feed reader, therefore bypassing all advertising altogether. I never click on ads. Ever. I do click through to blog sites from the headers, keeping money in the pockets of people like Dana, who do monetize their blogs as a source of income.
I understand how the bloggers feel — I do — the accusations of scraping and splogging have flown thick as a plague of flies. The bloggers are indignant over their original content; copyrighted, trademarked content, being repeated on another Web site. A monetized Web site. I get that. I just don’t feel that. Maybe it’s the industry I’m coming from. Some of you would consider me a “suit” — while a blogger, I’m also a PR person, with longstanding relationships with the media and other “suits.” It’s more than that, however. There’s very little pride of ownership in our industry. Many of the first writings I published were under someone else’s byline. We’re traditionally behind the scenes writers, accustomed to having our work appear on someone else’s site, with someone else’s title and photo dangling above our carefully crafted language. Perhaps this is why what David Mastio has done, is doing, doesn’t bother me one bit.
If you’re not already so tired of this topic you could spit, please share your take in the comments. And please, no flaming. I’m just sharing my opinion.
If you care to read the entire blogging backlog of BNN-blastingrelated* posts, I have linked to those I’ve read, below:
*(edited: I realized later that I generalized. Not all these posts were blasting BNN. There are several different opinions represented.)
Virtual St. Louis
Little Bald Doctors
WOBL in Training
Superfunpatrol
The State of Discontent
Mamalogues
Slacker Moms-R-Us
The Broad Brush
Prologos
A Bun’s Life
Highway 61
MidwestBlogs -St Louis
CourtneyWatson
STLbloggers
The News Bitch